| Author
|
Message |
|
justin
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 649
Offline
|
Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:33 pm Post subject:
Cyberonic is Best High speed residential DSL ISP |
|
|
I am using this from 7 months and its really works well, never got any problems or I have never doubt that this is the Best high speed residential DSL ISP
Last edited by justin on Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
|
 |
Tod
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 1101
Offline
|
Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:35 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| have they offered recently new high speed plans? |
|
| |
|
 |
justin
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 649
Offline
|
Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:38 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
yes
From their current hot deals the best is home DSL 6.0m/768k |
|
| |
|
 |
Tod
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 1101
Offline
|
Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:38 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| but they are charging $59.99/month and its little high |
|
| |
|
 |
siboi18
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 33
Offline
|
Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:00 pm Post subject:
Cyberonic DSL |
|
|
| I am with SBC yahoo right now and I'm satisfied with their service. DSL from them is about $10 cheaper than Cyberonic depending on what plan you want. More information can be found on SBC service at http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/?refer=dsl0. |
|
| |
|
 |
thehisoc
Guest
Posts: 59716
Offline
|
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 6:02 pm Post subject:
yeah right |
|
|
| Wow you sound like a bot^ |
|
| |
|
 |
iveyleeger
Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Offline
|
Posted:
Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:19 pm Post subject:
Cyberonic Sucks |
|
|
1. Had multiple visits from Covad, could not make a reliable connection working. Continual intermittent outages.
2. Charged me over $300 up front and never sent me the "rebate".
3. Charging $250 additional fee for cancelling contract although the service never worked properly.
What they really are is a Covad reseller. And they don't know what they are doing. They cannot get the system to work. Probably b/c the phone co. doesn't want them too. But now I am out a lot of money, and I wasted a lot of time. I recommend: look elsewhere! |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|